Complete project setup documentation for financial services programmes. Everything needed to establish governance, align stakeholders, and get delivery off to a controlled start — including PID, RACI, stakeholder analysis, governance framework, and risk register.
30-minute onboarding call included. Questions? Get in touch.
Preview the key deliverables in this template pack
| 1 | Project Definition & Background | Business context, drivers, problem statement |
| 2 | Business Case & Benefits | Financial justification, benefits register |
| 3 | Scope Statement | In-scope, out-of-scope, assumptions |
| 4 | Governance & Organisation | Steering committee, reporting lines |
| 5 | Approach & Methodology | Delivery method, phases, quality gates |
| 6 | Planning & Milestones | High-level timeline, key milestones |
| 7 | Resource Plan | Team structure, FTE allocation, skills |
| 8 | Risk & Issue Management | Approach, initial risks, escalation |
| 9 | Dependencies & Constraints | External dependencies, regulatory dates |
| 10 | Communication Plan | Stakeholder comms, frequency, channels |
| 11 | Quality Management | Quality criteria, review process |
| 12 | Approval & Sign-Off | Authorisation matrix, signatures |
Financial services projects consistently underinvest in initiation. The first 2–4 weeks set the trajectory for the entire programme, yet most teams cobble together governance structures and stakeholder plans from whatever templates they can find. The result is misaligned expectations, unclear accountability, and governance gaps that surface months later as delivery blockers.
This pack provides a coherent, interconnected set of initiation documents designed specifically for regulated environments. Every template references the others — the RACI links to the PID's governance section, the stakeholder plan feeds the communication plan, and the risk register connects to the planning milestones. It's a system, not a collection of standalone files.
12-section Word template covering project definition, business case, scope, governance, methodology, planning, resources, risk management, dependencies, communication, quality, and formal sign-off. Pre-populated with guidance notes and financial services–specific examples.
Excel-based responsibility assignment matrix with 30+ pre-defined activities typical for FS projects. Includes separate sheet with detailed role descriptions, escalation paths, and guidance on common RACI mistakes to avoid.
Three-sheet workbook: stakeholder register, influence/interest mapping, and engagement action plan. Pre-formatted for the stakeholder archetypes found in FS programmes — sponsors, compliance officers, regulators, business unit leads, and technology teams.
Word document defining the governance structure: steering committee terms of reference, decision-making authority matrix, escalation procedures, and meeting cadence. Adapted for typical FS governance requirements including three-lines-of-defence model alignment.
Dual-sheet Excel workbook with risk register (likelihood × impact scoring, mitigation tracking) and issue log (priority, owner, resolution date, lessons learned). Includes conditional formatting for automatic RAG status and dashboard summary.
Gantt-style planning template with milestone tracking, dependency mapping, and critical path highlighting. Designed for programmes with regulatory deadlines — includes buffer calculation and deadline sensitivity analysis.
Structured decision register capturing context, options considered, decision rationale, decision-maker, and date. Essential for audit trail requirements in regulated environments and for onboarding new team members mid-project.
This pack is designed for project managers, programme managers, and PMO leads in financial services who are setting up new projects or programmes. It's especially valuable when establishing governance for regulatory change programmes, setting up cross-functional delivery teams where role clarity is critical, and onboarding external delivery partners who need to align with your governance standards.
No. The templates work with waterfall, agile, and hybrid delivery approaches. The PID structure follows PRINCE2-inspired best practice but is designed to be methodology-agnostic. The planning template supports both milestone-based and iteration-based timelines.
Cross-references are built in. The PID references the RACI, stakeholder plan, and risk register by section. The governance framework links to the RACI's accountability column. The decision log references PID section numbers for traceability. This interconnection is deliberate — it creates a coherent initiation baseline rather than isolated documents.
Absolutely. All templates use standard Word and Excel formatting with clearly marked placeholder sections. Headers, footers, and cover pages are designed to be easily rebranded. The content structure — which is the real value — remains intact regardless of visual customisation.
Yes. Each template includes embedded guidance notes (in grey text) explaining what goes in each section, why it matters, and what good looks like. These notes are designed to be deleted once you've completed the section. Additionally, the PID includes a worked example appendix showing a completed mini-case study.
Yes. The pack is designed for self-service use, but Diletti offers advisory support for teams that want experienced facilitation of the initiation process. This typically involves a 2–3 week engagement covering stakeholder workshops, governance design, and PID development. Get in touch to discuss.
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site. With your permission we also set statistics cookies (Google Analytics) and marketing cookies (Calendly scheduling). You can change this choice anytime via the footer. See our privacy statement and cookie statement.